Monday Memo No. 75
Style and smart purchases I’m making for spring.
Style and smart purchases I’m making for spring.
Hmmm. I loved the look of the Bailey 44 black pants, but according to their chart, I’d had to have no more than a 16” waist (and 17″ hips — each, maybe?). I don’t think even Scarlett could claim that. Also, if that model is wearing even a 30″ inseam, and the pants drag on the ground, then the photo is horribly photo shopped! Even if the measurements are metric, it still doesn’t make sense.
Can you shed some light? Thanks!
When measurements seem absurdly small like these it’s presumed they’re taken laying flat. So an XS at 12.75″ across the waist and 14.5″ across the hips would fit a 25.5″ waist, 29″ hips. And yeah, I agree, the inseam measurements don’t quite fit the image portrayed by the model with the flooding pant hem, but my guess is the model’s petite + the pants look crazy longer than the noted inseam due to the high waistline (remember inseam is measured crotch to hem). I personally trust Mary’s opinions on things since she’s putting her reputation on the line by suggesting basically anything. I’m actually considering trying them for my post-baby bod come end of May (I desperately want to burn all my leggings once baby’s born…). And if anything, Amazon has a good return policy so I’ll just return ’em if they don’t work for me!
Those two Zimmerman shirt dresses are beautiful and dreamy! I wish I had a taller frame to pull these styles off. *sigh* Looking forward to both 70-degree weather and future posts where you model them, Mary!
Leave a Reply